http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments Helpful Advice Without The Bull Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:45:00 +0000 http://backend.userland.com/rss092 en So, I wonder at times, just where does the responsibility rest? If you promote sites where the model is 18 or older, and you find that a sponsor is suddenly informed a model they used claims to be underage, whose responsibility is it? To begin with, let's take a look at the ... http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments/2008/07/25/affiliate-merry-go-round/ Supposedly a Twink Site has been banned from the Google Index, and it has some people scared. Well one anyhow. The thing is this, SO? Seriously, Google is a business, like any other business. It provides a service to it's customers, and because it has a large number of customers, some ... http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments/2008/07/06/entitlement-google-adult-sites/ Those in the Adult Industry know how volatile the credit card processing aspect of our business is. Remember iBill? Today's players seem more stable, but they are at the mercy of the Credit Card Companies and Banks. Doesn't make our job any easier when the attitude of these processors comes ... http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments/2008/06/26/changing-face-of-cc-processing/ Once more into the breech, or is it about the crumbs being left behind? Cookies, and their duration, as set by Sponsors, is an issue many webmasters get passionate about, but I wonder, should we? I mean does it really matter if a cookie is set for infinity or 24 hours? Myself, ... http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments/2008/06/22/cookie-paranoia/ I was reading about XSS exploits on Matt Cutts blog, and noticed a comment that has me wondering if Google isn't automatically penalizing sites with 'porn' either in a textual content, or in actual content. What has me wondering is the way it was included in this particular paragraph: If you’ve noticed ... http://nobullwebmastering.com/comments/2008/06/18/google-and-porn/